Save your biz by knowing your rights

12488 1001898 243x300 Save your biz by knowing your rights

Angela Itzikowitz

Lately emails have been doing the rounds advising consumers to check with their credit providers whether their debt has been securitised or not.

It was thanks to a similar email which he received about two years ago, that Johannesburg business owner Damon Greville was able to score a small victory in the South Gauteng High Court.

This, after he allegedly discovered that despite his loan was securitised, litigation papers sent to him were in the name of the credit provider instead of the securitisation company.

The securitisation of debt was also cited as one of contributing factors to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.

So, what is securitisation and what do you, as the consumer, need to know about it?

Small Business Connect spoke to law firm ENSafrica’s executive of banking and finance, Professor Angela Itzikowitz.

“Securitisation happens when a credit provider – bank or non-bank – bundles some of its loans together and then sells it to a special purpose vehicle (SPV),” says Itzikowitz.

A SPV, in layman’s terms is basically a securitisation company and is just a shell used to buy loans by getting investors to fund the sale of these loans.

On the flip side, the credit provider is able to get readily available cash and transfer the risk by selling the debt.

“In terms of South African law, there is no requirement for the credit provider to notify the debtor of the sale,” says Itzikowitz.

Despite this and though it’s not obligatory, most loan agreements contain a “cession clause” which advises the debtor that the debt could possibly be sold.

“But where a debtor requests information on whether a loan has been securitised, it is the debtor’s right to be provided with this information,” she says.

Itzikowitz advises business owners not to be concerned should their loan be securitised as this is standard industry practice.

It is also standard practice for the credit provider to sign an agreement with the SPV to collect the debt as the agent on behalf of the SPV, once the debt has been sold.

Despite this it will still be “business as usual” for the debtor, who will continue making the repayment as stipulated by the loan agreement.

Angela Itzikowitz, Damon Greville, ENSafrica,

We welcome comments and point out that the views of those who comment are not necessarily our views at Small Business Connect, its publishers, sponsors, or the dti. We invite debate, but insist on civility. We will not post personal attacks, name calling or foul language. If you wish to report inappropriate comments for our moderator to review, please use the Flag as inappropriate function provided.

  • Scott Colin Cundill

    Spoken like a true bloody lawyer who has absolutely NO IDEA what securitsation is REALLY about. Unbelievable.

  • Mark Peyton

    I would love a rational explanation, of how it comes to pass, that a cession clause effectively absolves a so called “lender” from the laws/t’s&c’s/rules embedded in Law of contract, NCA and CPA.

    Why all the secrecy w.r.t. securitisation? Why are “lenders” burning documentation? Why do regulators refuse to comment?

    And how exactly does this “shell” company get to take a decision to foreclose on a “loan” in default, especially when it is operating (sic) at arm’s length? Surely it takes a human being to make such a decision. Who are these humans? Where are they? Why do they not come forward and answer my rightfully posed questions?

    Instead, all we get is spiel – in brochure format – from a few very worried “lenders”, painting a picture of legitimacy to this mysterious and tragically damaging form of “lending”.

    To the tens of thousands of Transnet folk, who’s pension savings have vanished into thin air, ask your fund ‘managers’ (sic) for full disclosure pertaining to the exposure of your sacred savings to poorly regulated securitisation schemes.. The tragedy shall prevail, until these swine are thrown into jails, and for meaningful terms.

  • Peter Storbeck

    Angela, you have done your reputation absolutely no favours with this opinion piece which at best is vague, and at worst completely dishonest. US Banks have already paid over billions in reparations because of securitised foreclosures that were illegal, and millions more are going to be paid over. Is that what you mean by “business as usual”? If it is, then I cannot wait for that type of “business as usual” to hit our banks – HARD.

Supported by the dti & published by BusinessOwner&Co. Use of information is at own risk. Neither the dti nor the publisher may be held liable for any loss or damage that may occur as a result thereof.